Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1697103

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour

From Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour
Date 2017-07-26 15:40 +0200
Message-ID <u7uHF-SQ-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <u7qkF-6w4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7qkF-6w4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7tse-aO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7tLz-jq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7tVf-mT-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:

> On Wed 26-07-17 14:33:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 26-07-17 13:11:46, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> [...]
>> > I've been running tests from mce-test suite and libhugetlbfs for similar
>> > changes we did on arm64. There could be assumptions that were not
>> > exercised but I'm not sure how to check for all the possible usages.
>> > 
>> > Do you have any other suggestions that can help improve confidence in
>> > the patch?
>> 
>> Unfortunatelly I don't. I just know there were many subtle assumptions
>> all over the place so I am rather careful to not touch the code unless
>> really necessary.
>> 
>> That being said, I am not opposing your patch.
>
> Let me be more specific. I am not opposing your patch but we should
> definitely need more reviewers to have a look. I am not seeing any
> immediate problems with it but I do not see a large improvements either
> (slightly less nightmare doesn't make me sleep all that well ;)). So I
> will leave the decisions to others.

I hear you - I'd definitely appreciate more eyes on the code change and
description.

Thanks for taking a look.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> - 2017-07-25 17:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and  document behaviour Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-07-26 10:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and  document behaviour Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-26 11:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> - 2017-07-26 14:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and  document behaviour Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-26 14:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and  document behaviour Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-26 14:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> - 2017-07-26 15:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and  document behaviour Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> - 2017-07-27 05:20 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and document behaviour Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> - 2017-07-27 15:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() consistent and  document behaviour Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-26 11:00 +0200

csiph-web