Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697064
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() |
| Date | 2017-07-26 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7u4V-qb-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u6V7b-3vi-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7aIV-539-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7q1k-6pF-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:32:44 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:10:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 01:00:12 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:31:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > > > > > On one of my test machines nhi_mailbox_cmd() called from icm_suspend() > > > > times out and returnes an error which then is propagated to the > > > > caller and causes the entire system suspend to be aborted which isn't > > > > very useful. > > > > > > > > Instead of aborting system suspend, print the error into the log > > > > and continue. > > > > > > I agree, it should not prevent suspend but I wonder why it fails in the > > > first place? Can you check what is the return value? > > > > As per the above, the error is a timeout, ie. -ETIMEDOUT. > > Ah, right I somehow missed that. > > Does it have Falcon Ridge controller or Alpine Ridge? I'll check later today, but i guess you'll know (see below). > Just to make sure, can you increase the timeout in nhi_mailbox_cmd() > to 1000ms or so. It should not take that long though but better to check. Well, I can do that, but I don't think it will help. It just looks like the chip is not responding at all at that point. > Which system this is BTW? It's the Dell 9360. :-) Sometimes after a reboot or a power cycle it starts in a state in which the TBT controller and a USB one (which seem to be somehow connected) appear to be dead or at least really flaky. Basically, the box needs to be power-cycled again to get rid of this condition and then everything works. Thanks, Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-25 01:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-25 12:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-25 18:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-26 10:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-26 15:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-26 15:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-26 19:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-27 11:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-28 02:10 +0200
RE: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() "Jamet, Michael" <michael.jamet@intel.com> - 2017-07-31 09:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0200
csiph-web