Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697766
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks |
| Date | 2017-07-27 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7Lfs-37f-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u7qNI-6Vf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7qNI-6Vf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7JGF-25a-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7K02-2bI-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7Kjn-2xb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 26-07-17, 23:13, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 26-07-17, 22:34, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > @@ -221,7 +226,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, > >> > sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags); > >> > sg_cpu->last_update = time; > >> > > >> > - if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) > >> > + if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time, hook->cpu)) > >> > return; > >> > >> Since with the remote callbacks now possible, isn't it unsafe to > >> modify sg_cpu and sg_policy structures without a lock in > >> sugov_update_single? > >> > >> Unlike sugov_update_shared, we don't acquire any lock in > >> sugov_update_single before updating these structures. Did I miss > >> something? > > > > As Peter already mentioned it earlier, the callbacks are called with > > rq locks held and so sugov_update_single() wouldn't get called in > > parallel for a target CPU. > > Ah ok, I have to catch up with that discussion since I missed the > whole thing. Now that you will have me on CC, that shouldn't happen, > thanks and sorry about the noise. > > > That's the only race you were worried about ? > > Yes. So then in that case, makes sense to move raw_spin_lock in > sugov_update_shared further down? (Just discussing, this point is > independent of your patch), Something like: Even that was discussed tomorrow with Peter :) No it wouldn't work because sg_cpu->util we are updating here may be getting read from some other cpu that shares policy with sg_cpu. -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
[PATCH V4 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Process remote callback for shared policies Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Process remote callback for shared policies "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 07:50 +0200
[PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-26 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 05:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 07:40 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 08:00 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 08:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 09:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 11:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 12:00 +0200
[PATCH V4 3/3] cpufreq: governor: Process remote callback for shared policies Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 07:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 07:50 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 08:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 09:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-27 09:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 05:50 +0200
csiph-web