Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697724
| From | "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks |
| Date | 2017-07-27 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7JGF-25a-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u7qNI-6Vf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7qNI-6Vf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Viresh,
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> We do not call cpufreq callbacks from scheduler core for remote
> (non-local) CPUs currently. But there are cases where such remote
> callbacks are useful, specially in the case of shared cpufreq policies.
>
> This patch updates the scheduler core to call the cpufreq callbacks for
> remote CPUs as well.
>
> For now, all the registered utilization update callbacks are updated to
> return early if remote callback is detected. That is, this patch just
> moves the decision making down in the hierarchy.
>
> Later patches would enable remote callbacks for shared policies.
>
> Based on initial work from Steve Muckle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
<snip>
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -72,10 +72,15 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sugov_cpu, sugov_cpu);
>
> /************************ Governor internals ***********************/
>
> -static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time)
> +static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
> + int target_cpu)
> {
> s64 delta_ns;
>
> + /* Don't allow remote callbacks */
> + if (smp_processor_id() != target_cpu)
> + return false;
> +
> if (sg_policy->work_in_progress)
> return false;
>
> @@ -221,7 +226,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
> sg_cpu->last_update = time;
>
> - if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
> + if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time, hook->cpu))
> return;
Since with the remote callbacks now possible, isn't it unsafe to
modify sg_cpu and sg_policy structures without a lock in
sugov_update_single?
Unlike sugov_update_shared, we don't acquire any lock in
sugov_update_single before updating these structures. Did I miss
something?
thanks,
-Joel
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
[PATCH V4 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Process remote callback for shared policies Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Process remote callback for shared policies "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 07:50 +0200
[PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-26 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 05:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 07:40 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 08:00 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 08:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 09:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 11:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 12:00 +0200
[PATCH V4 3/3] cpufreq: governor: Process remote callback for shared policies Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-26 11:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 07:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 07:50 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 08:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 09:20 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-27 09:30 +0200
Re: [Eas-dev] [PATCH V4 0/3] sched: cpufreq: Allow remote callbacks "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 05:50 +0200
csiph-web