Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1692991
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? |
| Date | 2017-07-20 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u5kW6-lk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u566K-6L0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u56q6-77M-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u5dUC-3XI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u5gps-5yL-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:52:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 20-07-17, 01:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > We have a particular ARM CPU design that is drawing quite a lot of > >> > current upon exit from WFI, and it does so in a way even before the > >> > first instruction out of WFI is executed. That means we cannot influence > >> > directly the exit from WFI other than by changing the state in which it > >> > would be previously entered because of this "dead" time during which the > >> > internal logic needs to ramp up back where it left. > >> > > >> > A naive approach to solving this problem because we have CPU frequency > >> > scaling available would be to do the following: > >> > > >> > - just before entering WFI, switch to a low frequency OPP > >> > - enter WFI > >> > - upon exit from WFI, ramp up the frequency back to e.g: highest OPP > >> > > >> > Some of the parts that I am not exactly clear on would be: > >> > > >> > - would that qualify as a cpuidle governor of some kind that ties in > >> > which cpufreq? > >> > - would using cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() be an appropriate API to use > >> > from outside Can your ARM part change OPP without scheduling? Because (for obvious reasons) the idle thread is not supposed to block.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 01:00 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-07-20 01:20 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-20 09:20 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-07-20 11:30 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 01:10 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-07-20 12:00 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-20 16:50 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 01:00 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-21 02:20 +0200
Re: cpuidle and cpufreq coupling? Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 02:40 +0200
csiph-web