Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1690637
| From | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] sysfs: add devm_sysfs_create_group() and friends |
| Date | 2017-07-18 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u4Hi2-71I-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u4GvD-6vZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4GvE-6vZ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4GYF-6V8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:30:58PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > --- a/include/linux/sysfs.h > > +++ b/include/linux/sysfs.h > > @@ -282,6 +282,16 @@ int __compat_only_sysfs_link_entry_to_kobj(struct kobject *kobj, > > struct kobject *target_kobj, > > const char *target_name); > > > > +struct device; > > Put this in device.h instead? I think we normally keep devm* and non-managed APIs together, like both regulator*() and devm_regulator*() are in include/linux/regulator/consumer.h, gpiod*() and devm_gpiod*() are in include/gpio/linux/consumer.h, clk*() and devm_clk() are in include/linux/clk.h, and so forth. I think there is benefit of having these together as well. > > > +int __must_check devm_sysfs_create_group(struct device *dev, > > + const struct attribute_group *grp); > > +int __must_check devm_sysfs_create_groups(struct device *dev, > > + const struct attribute_group **groups); > > +void devm_sysfs_remove_group(struct device *dev, > > + const struct attribute_group *grp); > > +void devm_sysfs_remove_groups(struct device *dev, > > + const struct attribute_group **groups); > > I have finally moved the driver core to only accept/need "groups" not a > single "group", so we should only need devm_sysfs_create_groups and > devm_sysfs_remove_groups, right? This makes total sense for the driver core, but individual drivers usually have a single group. Requiring all of them to have array of groups just adds unneeded boilerplate that I was trying to cut down. > > And do we need/want the non-devm versions: > device_create_groups() > device_remove_groups() > ? We already have non-managed sysfs_create_groups() and sysfs_remove_groups(). > > And you can probably drop the 'sysfs' from the function name if you > want. I think there is benefit of having devm version having name matching the non-managed one: sysfs_create_groups() and devm_sysfs_create_groups(). I hope you will reconsider. Thanks! -- Dmitry
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] New bind/unbingd uevents Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 21:40 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] sysfs: add devm_sysfs_create_group() and friends Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] sysfs: add devm_sysfs_create_group() and friends Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-18 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] sysfs: add devm_sysfs_create_group() and friends Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] sysfs: add devm_sysfs_create_group() and friends Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-19 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] New bind/unbingd uevents Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-18 22:10 +0200
csiph-web