Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1683124

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

On 07/07/17 14:28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 05-07-17, 09:59, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > To be able to treat utilization signals of different scheduling classes
> > in different ways (e.g., CFS signal might be stale while DEADLINE signal
> > is never stale by design) we need to split sugov_cpu::util signal in two:
> > util_cfs and util_dl.
> > 
> > This patch does that by also changing sugov_get_util() parameter list.
> > After this change, aggregation of the different signals has to be performed
> > by sugov_get_util() users (so that they can decide what to do with the
> > different signals).
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Are you referring to this response here ?
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149095102600847&w=2
> 

Yep.

> If yes, then I don't think it was about having separate APIs, but just storing
> util_cfs/dl separately.
> 
> > -static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
> > +static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> >  {
> >  	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> > -	unsigned long dl_util = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> > -				>> BW_SHIFT;
> >  
> > -	*max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id());
> > +	sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id());
> > +	sg_cpu->util_cfs = rq->cfs.avg.util_avg;
> > +	sg_cpu->util_dl = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> > +			  >> BW_SHIFT;
> > +}
> >  
> > +static unsigned long sugov_aggregate_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> 
> As Joel already mentioned, I don't think we should create two separate routines
> here.
> 

Mmm, it makes retrieving of utilization in sugov_update_shared and
aggregating values for the domain in sugov_next_freq_shared cleaner,
IMHO.

Thanks,

- Juri

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all  CPUs when deciding next freq Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-07 11:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all  CPUs when deciding next freq Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-11 18:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all  CPUs when deciding next freq Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-11 19:20 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 7/8] sched/sched.h: move arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 7/8] sched/sched.h: move  arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-08 00:10 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-07-07 05:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization  signals Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-07 11:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization  signals Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-07 13:00 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-07-10 09:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization  signals Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-10 09:10 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection  triggering points Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-07 09:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP  selection Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-06 18:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP  selection Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-06 18:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP  selection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-06 18:20 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-06 23:20 +0200

csiph-web