Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1682550

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 11:57:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed,  5 Jul 2017 09:58:57 +0100
> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > v1 of the RFC set implementing frequency/cpu invariance and OPP selection for
> 
> It would be nice if you specify what "OPP" stands for. A quick google
> search shows "Other Peoples Privates", which isn't the type of
> selection I would be looking for.

Its ARM speak for P-state. It stands for OPerating Point or something
like that. But yes, I too always play the Naughty by Nature song in my
head when I read that.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all  CPUs when deciding next freq Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-07 11:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all  CPUs when deciding next freq Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-11 18:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v1 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all  CPUs when deciding next freq Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-11 19:20 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 7/8] sched/sched.h: move arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 7/8] sched/sched.h: move  arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-08 00:10 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-07-07 05:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization  signals Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-07 11:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization  signals Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-07 13:00 +0200
        Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-07-10 09:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization  signals Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-10 09:10 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection  triggering points Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-07 09:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP  selection Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-06 18:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP  selection Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-07-06 18:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP  selection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-06 18:20 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-06 23:20 +0200

csiph-web