Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1682603
| From | Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() |
| Date | 2017-07-06 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u0iBA-8tF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tZ4Km-6Tf-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tZFAd-6E3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tZIoq-76-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | SUSE Linux GmbH |
Am 05.07.2017 um 04:36 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> On July 4, 2017 4:32:18 PM PDT, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Commit 18cfd9429d8a82c49add8f3ca9d366599bfcac45 ("ARM: owl: smp: Drop
>> bogus holding pen") simplified the S500 SMP code by removing a loop for
>> pen_release in owl_secondary_boot(). Since then it is only calling
>> owl_v7_invalidate_l1() before branching to secondary_startup().
>>
>> The owl_v7_invalidate_l1() assembler function is superfluous, too.
>> Therefore drop owl_secondary_boot() and use secondary_boot() directly.
>>
>> Cc: David Liu <liuwei@actions-semi.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> ---
>
>> - writel(virt_to_phys(owl_secondary_startup),
>> + writel(virt_to_phys(secondary_startup),
>> timer_base_addr + OWL_CPU1_ADDR + (cpu - 1) * 4);
>
> This is a kernel symbol so please use __pa_symbol() here, also you might want to build with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL and see if you get other warnings about using virt_to_phys() in the owl platform code (I did not check if there are other uses)
Thanks for the report. There are no other such uses in mach-actions, but
git-grep'ing for virt_to_phys in arch/arm/mach-* I spot at least one
other such usage in mach-oxnas:
arch/arm/mach-oxnas/platsmp.c:
writel(virt_to_phys(ox820_secondary_startup),
as well as this in mach-mvebu:
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c: writel(virt_to_phys(boot_addr), base +
MV98DX3236_CPU_RESUME_ADDR_REG);
and these in mach-at91:
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c: pm_bu->canary = virt_to_phys(&canary);
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c: pm_bu->resume = virt_to_phys(cpu_resume);
What exactly is the difference between the two macros that makes it
wrong despite apparently working? In particular I am wondering whether
the SoC/board vendors in CC need to fix it in their 3.10 trees, too.
In any case if this is a bug, I would rather fix it in a separate patch
for 4.13 and leave the name swap (this patch) for 4.14.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> - 2017-07-05 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> - 2017-07-06 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-07-06 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2017-07-07 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-07-06 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> - 2017-07-10 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot() Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 06:30 +0200
csiph-web