Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1630086
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed |
| Date | 2017-04-25 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tzUEx-4os-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tyqpb-4ED-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzLUD-7pd-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzNa1-87g-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzNa3-87g-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzO66-eo-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:19:47PM -0300, Lauro Venancio wrote: > On 04/24/2017 11:27 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>> Also, would it not make sense to re-order patch 2 to come after this, > >>> such that we _do_ have the group_mask available and don't have to jump > >>> through hoops in order to link up the sgc? Afaict we don't actually use > >>> the sgc until the above (reverse) loop computing the CPU capacities. > Yes, it has the same result. I duplicated the build_group_mask magic to > avoid building the complete mask for all instances of a group. > Currently, the mask is built just once per group. OK, but it was subtly different (using sched_domain_span(sibling) vs sched_group_cpus(sibling->groups)). And if there's anything this code could do with less of its confusion. I see your point about wasted computation, but this is very slow path code, nobody should care too much. And I much prefer simpler code. I'll see if I can come up with some coherent comments as well. This code certainly can use some.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/4] sched/topology: fix overlap group capacity and balance cpu Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-20 22:00 +0200
[PATCH 1/4] sched/topology: optimize build_group_mask() Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-20 22:00 +0200
[PATCH 3/4] sched/topology: move comment about asymmetric node setups Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-20 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched/topology: move comment about asymmetric node setups Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH 2/4] sched/topology: all instances of a sched group must use the same sched_group_capacity Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-20 22:00 +0200
[PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Lauro Ramos Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-20 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Lauro Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-24 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Lauro Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-24 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Lauro Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-25 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Lauro Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/topology: the group balance cpu must be a cpu where the group is installed Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-25 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/topology: fix overlap group capacity and balance cpu Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-26 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/topology: fix overlap group capacity and balance cpu Lauro Venancio <lvenanci@redhat.com> - 2017-04-26 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/topology: fix overlap group capacity and balance cpu Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-27 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/topology: fix overlap group capacity and balance cpu Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-28 12:40 +0200
csiph-web