Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1629435
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling |
| Date | 2017-04-24 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tzKc9-6ly-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tyOUy-2RV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzHHk-4GC-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzK2u-6io-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 01:00:18PM +0200, PaX Team wrote: > On 24 Apr 2017 at 10:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Also, you forgot nr_cpus in your bound. Afaict the worst case here is > > O(nr_tasks + 3*nr_cpus). > > what does nr_cpus have to do with winning the race? The CPUs could each run nested softirq/hardirq/nmi context poking at the refcount, irrespective of the (preempted) task context. > > Because PaX does it, is not a correctness argument. And this really > > wants one. > > heh, do you want to tell me about how checking for a 0 refcount prevents > exploiting a bug? Not the point. All I said was that saying somebody else does it (anybody else, doesn't matter it was you) isn't an argument for correctness.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-22 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 10:40 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> - 2017-04-24 11:00 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> - 2017-04-24 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> - 2017-04-24 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> - 2017-04-24 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-24 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-24 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-24 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-24 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount_t handling Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-24 22:30 +0200
csiph-web