Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length

From	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length
Date	2017-04-20 08:10 +0200
Message-ID	<tydrX-5iV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<txXnb-3yQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <txXnc-3yQ-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 6a128f3a7ed1..bb86681c8a10 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1382,6 +1382,28 @@ bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +bool is_valid_kprobe_symbol_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +	size_t sym_len;
> +	char *s;
> +
> +	s = strchr(name, ':');
> +	if (s) {
> +		sym_len = strnlen(s+1, KSYM_NAME_LEN);
> +		if (sym_len <= 0 || sym_len >= KSYM_NAME_LEN)
> +			return false;
> +		sym_len = (size_t)(s - name);
> +		if (sym_len <= 0 || sym_len >= MODULE_NAME_LEN)
> +			return false;
> +	} else {
> +		sym_len = strnlen(name, MODULE_NAME_LEN);
> +		if (sym_len <= 0 || sym_len >= MODULE_NAME_LEN)
> +			return false;
> +	}

I think this is probably more elaborate than it needs to be.

Why not just check the string is <= (MODULE_NAME_LEN + KSYM_NAME_LEN) ?

cheers

Thread

[PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-19 15:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-04-19 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-19 18:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-04-21 15:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-23 17:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-04-20 08:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name length "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-20 09:30 +0200
  [PATCH v4 4/7] powerpc/kprobes: Use safer string functions in kprobe_lookup_name() "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 14:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] powerpc/kprobes: Use safer string functions in  kprobe_lookup_name() Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 15:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] powerpc/kprobes: Use safer string functions in  kprobe_lookup_name() Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 15:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] powerpc/kprobes: Use safer string functions in  kprobe_lookup_name() Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 16:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] powerpc/kprobes: Use safer string functions in  kprobe_lookup_name() "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-23 19:20 +0200
  [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during probe registration "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 14:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during  probe registration Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during  probe registration "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 15:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided  during probe registration Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-04-21 16:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during probe registration Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-04-22 08:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] kprobes: validate the symbol name provided during  probe registration "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-23 19:50 +0200

csiph-web