Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1626670

Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tool, arm64, thunderx2: Add implementation defined events for ThunderX2

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Mark,


On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:50:33AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:42:39PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:06:43PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> >> >> +     "CPU" :"armv8_pmuv3_0"
>> >> >
>> >> > Please let's not hard-code the name like this. Surely we can get rid of this?
>> >> >
>> >> > The kernel doesn't currently name PMUs as armv8_pmuv3_*, and as that can
>> >> > differ across DT/ACPI and in big.LITTLE, I don't think it makes sense to
>> >> > try to rely one particular string regardless.
>> >>
>> >> This string/name is fixed for a platform. having name here is essential to
>> >> know which devices among pmu (armv8_pmuv3_0, breakpoint, software)
>> >> devices, these jevents to be added.
>> >> also this json file is specific to a arch/soc/board, it is not a
>> >> generic file to be common.
>> >
>> > This file describe the events of a CPU PMU, and CPUs are not specific to
>> > a platform in general. There are many systems using Cortex-A57, for
>> > example.
>> >
>> > Across big.LITTLE SoCs with Cortex-A57, there's no guarantee as to
>> > whether the Cortex-A57 cores would be named armv8_pmuv3_0, or
>> > armv8_pmuv3_1, etc. This would depend on the boot CPU, probe order of
>> > secondaries, etc.

some of the applications(perf etc) use sysfs files of perf PMU CORE devices.
at present the names are created as per SOC/platform like
armv8_pmuv3, armv8_cavium_thunder,  armv8_cortex_a57 etc.

cpu_pmu->name                   = "armv8_cavium_thunder";

can we please have common name similar to x86(cpu) and call them as
cpu_0 and cpu_1?

>>
>> OK, we may not have complete name however, common part can be used to recognize
>> the PMU CORE devices from /sys/bus/event_source/devices
>> i.e we can have CPU id as "armv8_pmuv3".
>
> For better or worse, that's not the case on DT systems.
>
> I'd much rather that we identified the CPU PMUs without requiring
> particular names (e.g by looking for a "cpus" attribute).
>
>> same is extended to UNCORE as well.
>
> Could you elaborate on that? I'm not sure I follow.
>
>> mapfile.csv file will have entry for both BIG and LITTLE processors event files.
>> the jevents creates table of pmu_events_map for all entries present in
>> mapfile.csv file
>> while lookup, which ever pmu matches the cpuid of pmu_events_map
>> then corresponding table created from json file is used to add the
>> jevents to that PMU.
>
> Sorry, but I don't follow how that's related to the above.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.

thanks
Ganapat

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tool, arm64, thunderx2: Add implementation  defined events for ThunderX2 Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 20:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tool, arm64, thunderx2: Add implementation  defined events for ThunderX2 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-04-20 11:00 +0200

csiph-web