Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1625357
| From | Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] added SECURITY_TIOCSTI_RESTRICT kernel config |
| Date | 2017-04-18 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <txCiK-7dQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tx81j-5DY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tx81k-5DY-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <tx8NI-5UK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Corporation |
> Since tty sessions are usually separated by different users, how would > they have the same one and yet need something like this? > > Also, why not put this in the tty config section? The normal attack use case people argue about is a rogue process on the users machine sitting there waiting until the user has logged in to a remote machine and is idle and then doing stuff. Attackers of course don't bother doing that because it's easier to get the user to run a different ssh client instead. Alan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/4] added SECURITY_TIOCSTI_RESTRICT kernel config Matt Brown <matt@nmatt.com> - 2017-04-17 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] added SECURITY_TIOCSTI_RESTRICT kernel config Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-04-17 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] added SECURITY_TIOCSTI_RESTRICT kernel config Matt Brown <matt@nmatt.com> - 2017-04-18 06:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] added SECURITY_TIOCSTI_RESTRICT kernel config Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2017-04-18 16:30 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 1/4] added SECURITY_TIOCSTI_RESTRICT kernel config Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-18 17:50 +0200
csiph-web