Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1622241
| From | Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function |
| Date | 2017-04-12 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tvsnw-680-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tvmrM-2Do-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <tvp6h-3Zp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tvqF4-51n-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <tvqYp-58l-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2017-04-12 15:58 GMT+02:00 Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>: > Even your usage of selinux_is_enabled() looks suspect; that should > probably go away. Only other user of it seems to be some cred validity > checking that could be dropped as well. Well the main reason for calling selinux_is_enabled() is performance optimization. Should I propose a patch to add a new security_is_enabled() function at the LSM abstraction layer? Or do you consider we should not test security enabled at all?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> - 2017-04-12 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-12 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-12 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-12 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-12 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Sebastien Buisson <sbuisson.ddn@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-12 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2017-04-13 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] selinux: add selinux_is_enforced() function Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2017-04-12 14:10 +0200
csiph-web