Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1619879
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() |
| Date | 2017-04-10 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuGVA-IQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <tthPB-2yp-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttk15-4lh-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttkkq-4sU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttkDL-4B1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tubyp-5Rg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 11:12:14AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> Oops, sorry to bring in the regression with my cleanup.
> I haven't noticed there is a kernel command line "numa=fake", which
> is the cause of the crash I think.
Of course it is, didn't you see my debugging upthread?
> So from my understanding, I am goting to do these tests:
>
> 1. all fake numa scenarios with Kirill's qemu command line
It is enough if you boot the kernel with "numa=fake..."
> 2. Real numa scenarios with following qemu command option
Not qemu command option but a kernel cmdline option.
> 3. Baremetal
>
> One more question, on the baremetal mathine, I can't change the
> numa configuration, so there would be only one case. Do you have
> some specific requirement?
numa=fake on baremetal too.
> Well, if I missed something, just let me know :-)
>
> > Qemu can emulate real numa too, for example you can boot with:
> >
> > -smp 64 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=1-8 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=9-16 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=2,cpus=17-24 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=3,cpus=25-32 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=4,cpus=0 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=4,cpus=33-39 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=5,cpus=40-47 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=6,cpus=48-55 \
> > -numa node,nodeid=7,cpus=56-63
Also, do this in kvm. kvm can emulate a lot of numa configurations, do
experiment with those too.
Basically, try to break your "cleanup". Stuff one should do for every
patch one sends anyway.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-04-06 14:50 +0200
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-06 17:10 +0200
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-06 20:10 +0200
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-04-06 20:30 +0200
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-06 20:50 +0200
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 05:20 +0200
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-10 14:50 +0200
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] x86/mm/numa: remove the numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 18:50 +0200
csiph-web