Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1617445
| From | Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage |
| Date | 2017-04-06 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tt3CW-1eT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <trFjj-40B-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 06:28:41 +0200 Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > Livelock can be triggered by setting kworkers to SCHED_FIFO, then > suspend/resume.. you come back from sleepy-land with a spinning > kworker. For whatever reason, I can only do that with an enterprise > like config, my standard config refuses to play, but no matter, it's > "Typical broken usage". > > (yield() should be rendered dead) The kernel is not normally built to have kworkers run at SCHED_FIFO. The user has do some action to alter the process priorities. I classify this as user error. We don't support killing kworker threads either.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-02 06:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 00:40 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-05 05:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 07:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-05 08:20 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 02:00 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-06 03:10 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 12:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2017-04-06 02:40 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-06 03:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 12:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 13:10 +0200
csiph-web