Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1616540
| From | Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage |
| Date | 2017-04-05 05:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tsJNT-5yF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <trFjj-40B-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsFhf-2yy-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 15:39 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the report! Looks like a quick solution here is to replace
> this yield() with cond_resched(), it is harder to really wait for
> all qdisc's to transmit all packets.
No, cond_resched() won't help. What I did is below, but I suspect net
wizards will do something better.
---
net/sched/sch_generic.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/swait.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
@@ -901,6 +902,7 @@ static bool some_qdisc_is_busy(struct ne
*/
void dev_deactivate_many(struct list_head *head)
{
+ DECLARE_SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(swait);
struct net_device *dev;
bool sync_needed = false;
@@ -924,8 +926,7 @@ void dev_deactivate_many(struct list_hea
/* Wait for outstanding qdisc_run calls. */
list_for_each_entry(dev, head, close_list)
- while (some_qdisc_is_busy(dev))
- yield();
+ swait_event_timeout(swait, !some_qdisc_is_busy(dev), 1);
}
void dev_deactivate(struct net_device *dev)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-02 06:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 00:40 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-05 05:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 07:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-05 08:20 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 02:00 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-06 03:10 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 12:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2017-04-06 02:40 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-06 03:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 12:30 +0200
Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to yield() usage Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 13:10 +0200
csiph-web