Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1616684
| From | Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment |
| Date | 2017-04-05 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tsOud-bB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ts5dM-4gF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ts5dM-4gF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsfwv-2wG-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Joe, thanks for reviewing, I have run the command you advice on the entire kernel code, modifying the script to only match the newly introduced check case. There was 14389 hits, quite huge, so I cannot 100% certify that there are no false positives, but I have checked the output carefully and found 2 limit cases: 1) space character placed just after "/*" WARNING: Block comments starts with an empty /* #330: FILE: arch/alpha/kernel/core_irongate.c:330: + /* + * Check for within the AGP aperture... => 146 hits (grep -c -n -E "\/\* $" /tmp/check.txt) 2) // style comment followed by pointer dereference WARNING: Block comments starts with an empty /* #426: FILE: drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ca_en50221.c:426: + // success + *tupleType = _tupleType; => 4 hits Anyway this reveal comment style related issues, so I would say that we can keep script as it is, what do you think about ? Here is the count detail by first level of directories within kernel: $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: drivers/" 8859 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: arch/" 2306 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: fs/" 1136 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: sound/" 810 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: include/" 669 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: kernel/" 143 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: security/" 112 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: lib/" 91 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: tools/" 81 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: crypto/" 54 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: scripts/" 44 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: mm/" 35 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: block/" 27 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: virt/" 8 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: samples/" 5 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: ipc/" 5 $ grep FILE /tmp/check.txt | grep -c "FILE: certs/" 1 The complete output is there for reference: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24319042/ Best regards, Hugues. On 04/03/2017 09:06 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 10:08 +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote: >> Warn when block comments are not starting with blank comment: >> >> /* multiple lines >> * block comment, >> * => warning >> */ >> >> /* >> * multiple lines >> * block comment, >> * => no warning >> */ >> >> Exception made for networking files where rule is the >> exact opposite. > > I recall there was some reason I didn't do this > when adding the block comment code, but I don't > recall what it was. Perhaps it was the initial > line of files. > > Maybe your $realline > 2 test fixes it. Maybe not. > Dunno. > > If you run this against the entire kernel code > using a unique test type and not BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE > are there any false positives? > > Maybe test with something like: > > $ git ls-files -- "*.[ch]" | \ > xargs --max-args 20 ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --types=<your_unique_test> >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@st.com> - 2017-04-03 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-03 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com> - 2017-04-05 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-05 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com> - 2017-04-05 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-05 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com> - 2017-04-05 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com> - 2017-04-07 12:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-07 12:30 +0200
csiph-web