Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1614899
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op |
| Date | 2017-04-03 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ts3lD-35U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ts2zg-2z9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ts2zg-2z9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Minchan, On (04/03/17 14:17), Minchan Kim wrote: > With this clean-up phase, I want to use zram's wrapper function > to lock table access which is more consistent with other zram's > functions. which reminds me of... there was a discussion a long time ago, -rt people absolutely hate bit spin_locks and they suggested us to replace it with normal spin_locks (and I promised to take a look at it, but got interrupted and never really returned back to it). for !lockdep builds the impact is somewhat small; for lockdep builds we increase the memory usage, but a) lockdep builds are debug builds by definition, no one runs lockdep enabled kernels in production b) we have lockdep in zram now, which is nice c) spin_locks probably have better fairness guarantees what do you think? can we, in this patch set, also replce bit spin_locks with a normal spin_lock? -ss
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-04-03 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-04-03 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-04-04 07:00 +0200
csiph-web