Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1614129

Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file

From Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file
Date 2017-03-31 18:00 +0200
Message-ID <tr77X-6xs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tqnyb-ea-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqoky-T6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <tr0pQ-2e1-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:47:52AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:09:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > While playing with the resctrl interface I found it much
> > > easier to deal with cpumask list rather than just regular
> > > cpumask.
> > 
> > Could you please explain specifically why and when it's easier
> > to deal with cpumask list? In programming cases, cpumask
> > and cpumask list are almost same. And people are working
> > on higher level tools to control resctrl. The tools can
> > hide detailed regular cpumask or cpumask list and user
> > doesn't need to care lower level format of cpumask. So
> > is it really useful to add cpus_list?
> 
> Yes, because a lot of people including me do not care about these tools at
> all. Making it easy to read and write from the command line is the first
> thing to do.

Sure, you are right. Hopefully adding a bit more explanation in
the commit message will be helpful.

Thanks.

-Fenghua

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> - 2017-03-29 17:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> - 2017-03-29 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-03-29 18:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-03-30 17:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> - 2017-04-01 04:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-31 10:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> - 2017-03-31 18:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-31 11:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> - 2017-03-31 17:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-03-31 18:00 +0200
        [PATCHv2] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-04-09 18:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCHv2] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> - 2017-04-09 19:40 +0200
            [PATCHv3] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-04-10 09:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCHv3] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-10 11:50 +0200
                [PATCHv4] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-04-10 17:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCHv2] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-10 11:20 +0200

csiph-web