Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1608459
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array |
| Date | 2017-03-24 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <toyeo-2LK-69@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <tm5qb-2HS-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm5qb-2HS-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm5Tc-2W1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm5Tc-2W1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <toxV1-2ms-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:50:24PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > OK, I guess should not have referenced the llvm-linux page. > So here are reasons on our side that I am ready to vouch: > > - clang make it possible to implement KMSAN (dynamic detection of > uses of uninit memory) How does GCC make this impossible? > - better code coverage for fuzzing How so? Why can't the same be achieved using GCC? > - why simpler and faster development (e.g. we can port our user-space > hardening technologies -- CFI and SafeStack) That's just because you've already implemented this in clang, right? So less work for you. Not because its impossible.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Michael Davidson <md@google.com> - 2017-03-17 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> - 2017-03-17 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Michael Davidson <md@google.com> - 2017-03-17 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array hpa@zytor.com - 2017-03-17 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-24 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> - 2017-03-17 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-03-17 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-17 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-03-17 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-17 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-24 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2017-03-18 01:50 +0100
csiph-web