Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1603584
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array |
| Date | 2017-03-17 20:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tm5qb-2HS-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tlZkK-6pR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlZuq-6vs-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm4u5-21N-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm56O-2jb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm5qb-2HS-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:47:33PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> This problem is more general and is not specific to clang. It equally >> applies to different versions of gcc, different arches and different >> configs (namely, anything else than what a developer used for >> testing). > > I guess. We do carry a bunch of gcc workarounds along with the cc-* > macros in scripts/Kbuild.include. > >> A known, reasonably well working solution to this problem is >> a system of try bots that test patches before commit with different >> compilers/configs/archs. We already have such system in the form of >> 0-day bots. It would be useful to extend it with clang as soon as >> kernel builds. > > Has someone actually already talked to Fengguang about it? +Fengguang > Oh, and the stupid question: why the effort to build the kernel > with clang at all? Just because or are there some actual, palpable > advantages? On our side it is: - clang make it possible to implement KMSAN (dynamic detection of uses of uninit memory) - better code coverage for fuzzing - why simpler and faster development (e.g. we can port our user-space hardening technologies -- CFI and SafeStack) You can also find some reasons in the Why section of LLVM-Linux project: http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Michael Davidson <md@google.com> - 2017-03-17 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> - 2017-03-17 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Michael Davidson <md@google.com> - 2017-03-17 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array hpa@zytor.com - 2017-03-17 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-24 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> - 2017-03-17 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-03-17 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-17 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-03-17 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-17 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-24 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-24 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-17 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2017-03-18 01:50 +0100
csiph-web