Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online
Date	Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:00:02 +0100
Message-ID	<tm3om-Yu-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tlMxc-56x-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tlQKu-8g6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tm350-Ro-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=grqkfnQMaY8my3JcnOE8p9/a88vrBh5ZSq9xeIu4ZgA=; b=g5RSFxMlxyM9Waiy3+kgJUsupgqlLhjxXEuI7HjaZIh6xdJWVNXumSux9KVpEpO4ZD oAOefkTv3pJ/qvPzu8qswahtEOh8ZGw2u4enGEz+4X55DTBZYO/AlhKfRooRxbxMIdyV tgKEFRRl3tqPgrVPlerdoLu5xM1xyjcatqHmw=
X-Google-Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=grqkfnQMaY8my3JcnOE8p9/a88vrBh5ZSq9xeIu4ZgA=; b=bK/JjWtt3x3+2zEOhk+NEjqctROnQTtifrc4e5zlSswQFxWBUeOQj5nfF9LPw11GlA 1qCfIlibMvsWrMwkAA0eTBTd2mRRlmvCISXDabrxmWpAEdebAtkqzJ3DbfxOR3qcyDw4 iageQiJycox2/fQGDg05rS44nDdNEbS0vQt/87uV7bFiyTsj2T7xNCB7OMk6XgAUTApw qBXSZeWVEABeCrrXMU+i4nWUVRRzclLh+6/IHpI2l9gHREXZib9KR+J59/99mNy5JJuY HRyPsWO5q+h7m4EmMpONXY3C+BzYf3o1WfAoHqxGhoGyEbl2cSjLrGmhot/Tz+7snJua yZ8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State	AFeK/H0R5KhAjiLZVK+nlva8QdcOU6UGOe5HiM1/zLs7zhZrQbgubAR8ygOfDr8zWDqkRXX1exdDhRvAr3SE0pOh
X-Received	by 10.107.166.207 with SMTP id p198mr16094676ioe.15.1489768993989; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 09:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	8
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
X-Original-Date	Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:13:13 +0530
X-Original-Message-ID	<CAKohponGNdnd0Q8rEhMAa=M8EiUiEE6H0nkJYFCFCu+Ow3zw2Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<2084010.4xkKok06Gp@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170317032016.GC31040@vireshk-i7> <CAJZ5v0jNp9t8uu0S4yRjT-TLHOcrAeMmjFzU6eBaaCp+C4j5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1603462

Show key headers only | View raw

On 17 March 2017 at 22:01, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:

> IMO if we are not going to restore the governor, we also should not
> restore the limits as those things are related.  Now, the governor can
> be unloaded while the CPU is offline.

I thought about it earlier but then governor and policy min/max
looked independent to me. Why do you think they are related?

Thread

[PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-17 00:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-17 04:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-03-17 17:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-17 18:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-03-17 18:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-03-20 04:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-20 13:50 +0100
        [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-03-17 19:00 +0100

csiph-web