Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1598117
| From | Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: z3fold: suspicious return with spinlock held |
| Date | 2017-03-10 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tjAqt-1kb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tjAgO-1eI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:22:12AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> z3fold_reclaim_page() contains the only return that may
> leave the function with pool->lock spinlock held.
>
> 669 spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> 670 if (kref_put(&zhdr->refcount, release_z3fold_page)) {
> 671 atomic64_dec(&pool->pages_nr);
> 672 return 0;
> 673 }
>
> May be we need spin_unlock(&pool->lock); just before return?
I would tend to agree. sparse warns about this, and also about two
other locking problems ... which I'm not sure are really problems so
much as missing annotations?
mm/z3fold.c:467:35: warning: context imbalance in 'z3fold_alloc' - unexpected unlock
mm/z3fold.c:519:26: warning: context imbalance in 'z3fold_free' - different lock contexts for basic block
mm/z3fold.c:581:12: warning: context imbalance in 'z3fold_reclaim_page' - different lock contexts for basic block
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
z3fold: suspicious return with spinlock held Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> - 2017-03-10 22:30 +0100
Re: z3fold: suspicious return with spinlock held Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> - 2017-03-10 22:40 +0100
Re: z3fold: suspicious return with spinlock held Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> - 2017-03-10 23:00 +0100
Re: z3fold: suspicious return with spinlock held vitalywool@gmail.com - 2017-03-10 23:10 +0100
csiph-web