Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1593368

Re: [PATCH V11 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support

From "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V11 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support
Date 2017-03-06 15:10 +0100
Message-ID <ti1uP-Rx-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tdqau-8gh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdqav-8gh-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <telBM-7lx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfW6d-vq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <thYdA-6Qv-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello James,


On 3/6/2017 3:28 AM, James Morse wrote:
> On 28/02/17 19:43, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>> On 2/24/2017 3:42 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>> On 21/02/17 21:22, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>> Currently external aborts are unsupported by the guest abort
>>>> handling. Add handling for SEAs so that the host kernel reports
>>>> SEAs which occur in the guest kernel.
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>>> index b2d57fc..403277b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>>> @@ -602,6 +602,24 @@ static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr)
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>    /*
>>>> + * Handle Synchronous External Aborts that occur in a guest kernel.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    if(IS_ENABLED(HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {
>>>> +        nmi_enter();
>>>> +        ghes_notify_sea();
>>>> +        nmi_exit();
>>> This nmi stuff was needed for synchronous aborts that may have interrupted
>>> APEI's interrupts-masked code. We want to avoid trying to take the same set of
>>> locks, hence taking the in_nmi() path through APEI. Here we know we interrupted
>>> a guest, so there is no risk that we have interrupted APEI on the host.
>>> ghes_notify_sea() can safely take the normal path.
>> Makes sense, I can remove the nmi_* calls here.
> Just occurs to me: if we do this we need to add the rcu_read_lock() in
> ghes_notify_sea() as its not protected by the rcu/nmi weirdness.
>
True, would you suggest leaving these nmi_* calls or adding the rcu_* 
calls? And since that's only needed for this KVM case, shouldn't the 
rcu_* calls just replace the nmi_* calls here (outside of ghes_notify_sea)?

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH V11 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - 2017-03-06 11:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V11 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-06 15:10 +0100

csiph-web