Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1592867
| From | Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Arrays of variable length |
| Date | 2017-03-06 01:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <thOQV-8jX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <thAXE-6JA-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <thGA1-2jU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <thLJo-6ax-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> writes: > On Sun, 05 Mar 2017, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> writes: >> > Sparse complains for arrays declared with variable length >> > >> > 'warning: Variable length array is used' >> > >> > Prior to c99 this was not allowed but lgcc (c99) doesn't have problem >> > with that https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Length.html. >> > And also Linux kernel compilation with W=1 doesn't complain. >> > >> > Since sparse is used extensively would like to ask what is the correct >> > usage of arrays of variable length >> > within Linux Kernel. >> >> Variable-length arrays are a very bad idea. Don't use them, ever. >> If the size has a sane upper bound, just use that value statically. >> Otherwise, you have a stack overflow waiting to happen and should be >> using some kind of dynamic allocation instead. >> >> Furthermore, use of VLAs generally results in less efficient code. For >> instance, it forces gcc to waste a register for the frame pointer, and >> it often prevents inlining. > > Well, if we're going to forbid VLAs in the kernel, IMHO the kernel build > system should call gcc with -Werror=vla to get that point across early, > and flush out any offenders. If it were up to me, that's exactly what I'd do. -- Måns Rullgård
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Arrays of variable length Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 10:50 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-03-05 11:10 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2017-03-05 16:50 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> - 2017-03-05 22:20 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 23:00 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2017-03-06 01:40 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 09:10 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2017-03-09 14:10 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 15:00 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2017-03-09 15:20 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 15:30 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2017-03-09 15:50 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 15:30 +0100
Re: Arrays of variable length Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2017-03-09 15:50 +0100
csiph-web