Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency

From	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency
Date	2017-03-03 19:40 +0100
Message-ID	<th0hs-58n-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tels5-7i4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgovw-3Ky-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgw9H-Sh-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl> wrote:
>>> Commit 2cfa4b311acc ("platform/x86: intel-hid: Support 5 button array")
>>> contains some coding style cleanups compared to the code it was based
>>> on.  This patch series "backports" these cleanups to the rest of the
>>> driver in order to make it more self-consistent and removes a redundant
>>> set_bit() call as a bonus.
>>>
>>> This series was not tested on hardware supported by intel-hid.
>>
>> Alex, do you have an access to hardware to test? I wouldn't going to
>> apply this until I get your tag(s) (in the best case
>> Reviewed-and-tested-by).
>
> The patches look good and tested on Latitude 7480
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>

Pushed to testing.
Thanks.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 03:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com> - 2017-03-02 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 19:40 +0100

csiph-web