Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1

From	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1
Date	2017-02-27 23:20 +0100
Message-ID	<tfBOa-3yE-43@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tevB8-65j-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <teUg9-6KM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tf5lf-68s-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tfeeS-3NG-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:40:36PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Another option is to only have a single userfaultfd executable and pass
> an option (anon, hugetlb, shmem ...) that indicates the type of pages/mapping
> to test.

That sounds good to me. I guess it was quicker and it generated more
compact diffs to differentiate based on #ifdefs initially, but it
makes sense to unify those binaries into one now, as we don't mind the
size of the selftest executable. run_vmtests takes custom parameters
already, it will just take one more then.

Thanks,
Andrea

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-26 00:50 +0100
  Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1 Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-02-26 12:40 +0100
    Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> - 2017-02-26 22:10 +0100
      Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> - 2017-02-27 23:20 +0100

csiph-web