Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1587149
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't complain on module_param(foo, bar, 0) |
| Date | 2017-02-23 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tea3E-7vC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t8KWd-7ku-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <te9TY-7sz-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 00:10 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote: > > The following code snippet: > > > > module_param(writeable, bool, 0); > > > > yields this warning: > > > > ERROR: Use 4 digit octal (0777) not decimal permissions > > #390: FILE: drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c:143: > > +module_param(writeable, bool, 0); > > total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 1006 lines checked > > > > But 0000 is no easier to read than 0, and module_param() even > > specifically refers to 0. > > While this is all correct, the question is why we disallow to read > back on those parameters? why disallow root to read-back any parameter?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't complain on module_param(foo, bar, 0) Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-23 23:20 +0100 Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't complain on module_param(foo, bar, 0) Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-02-23 23:30 +0100
csiph-web