Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1588220
| From | Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode |
| Date | 2017-02-25 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <teRih-4H9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tere9-2Ov-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tet6h-4bt-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tev85-5AX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tex9T-7mc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
After looking through the code and seeing how some other filesystems
use call_rcu, it seems that call_rcu has to do with consistency and
waiting for stuff to complete before returning an object to the slab cache,
whereas we were just calling kmem_cache_free without worrying about that
kind of stuff...
Is that a "close enough" description of the error that is being
fixed here?
-Mike
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> wrote:
> Thanks Al... I was going to try and evaluate that patch next
> week, now all I have to do is test it <g> ...
>
> -Mike
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> That, AFAICS, fixes a real bug. Applied, and it needs Cc:stable as well.
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
>>> ---
>>> fs/orangefs/super.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> --- a/fs/orangefs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/orangefs/super.c
>>> @@ -115,6 +115,13 @@ static struct inode *orangefs_alloc_inod
>>> return &orangefs_inode->vfs_inode;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void orangefs_i_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
>>> +{
>>> + struct inode *inode = container_of(head, struct inode, i_rcu);
>>> + struct orangefs_inode_s *orangefs_inode = ORANGEFS_I(inode);
>>> + kmem_cache_free(orangefs_inode_cache, orangefs_inode);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void orangefs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>> {
>>> struct orangefs_inode_s *orangefs_inode = ORANGEFS_I(inode);
>>> @@ -123,7 +130,7 @@ static void orangefs_destroy_inode(struc
>>> "%s: deallocated %p destroying inode %pU\n",
>>> __func__, orangefs_inode, get_khandle_from_ino(inode));
>>>
>>> - kmem_cache_free(orangefs_inode_cache, orangefs_inode);
>>> + call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, orangefs_i_callback);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>>
>>>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-24 19:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-02-24 22:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> - 2017-02-25 00:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> - 2017-02-25 21:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> - 2017-02-27 01:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-27 02:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2017-02-27 10:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] orangefs: Use RCU for destroy_inode Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com> - 2017-02-27 15:50 +0100
csiph-web