Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1586064

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power

From Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power
Date 2017-02-22 12:10 +0100
Message-ID <tdCY1-Mr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <td2Uy-Zo-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdnvZ-6me-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdnFE-6qe-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tdtUK-2he-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization ARM

Show all headers | View raw



On 22/02/17 01:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 06:45:13 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:

[...]

>>
>> I take this back, you have everything you need in place, nothing needs
>> to be done. I just checked again. If I don't register PSCI suspend_ops,
>> I still get mem in /sys/power/state with s2idle in /sys/power/mem_sleep
>> which is exactly what we need. Again we don't support standby/shallow
>> state on ARM64/PSCI.
> 
> Except for one thing which may or may not be a concern here.
> 
> Suspend to idle should only go into states in which all of the available wakeup
> devices work.  If there are devices that cannot wake you up from a given state,
> this isn't "idle" any more, is it?
> 

True. In this Renasas platform, since the platform doesn't have PSCI
system suspend, we can only support s2idle and not s2ram. In this case
we don't ask platform to enter some system state whereas we suspend all
the devices(leaving wakeup capable devices active) and ask platform to
enter deepest idle state on all the CPUs. I still don't understand the
issue Geert is facing.

Geert, so far you have failed to explain what's different from the new
state you are adding and the existing s2idle.

> As for the device wakeup disable/enable interface, it is for controlling
> whether or not a given device should be allowed to generate wakeup signals at
> all.
> 
> The information on what states a given device can wake up the system from is
> platform-specific and generally would need to be taken into consideration at
> the platform level.
> 

Exactly, that's what I am trying to convince Geert ;)

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> - 2017-02-20 21:40 +0100
  [PATCH/RFC 2/6] PM / Wakeup: Add wakeup_source_available() Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> - 2017-02-20 21:40 +0100
  [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow suspend mode Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> - 2017-02-20 21:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 11:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 17:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 18:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-02-21 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 12:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 17:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 18:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-22 14:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-22 15:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 18:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 19:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 19:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow  suspend mode Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 19:30 +0100
  [PATCH/RFC 1/6] alarmtimer: Postpone wake-up source registration until really available Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> - 2017-02-20 21:40 +0100
  [PATCH/RFC 6/6] arm64: dts: r8a7796: Fix non-PMIC wake-up sources Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> - 2017-02-20 21:40 +0100
  [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> - 2017-02-20 21:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 12:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 17:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 17:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-02-21 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 17:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 19:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 18:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-22 15:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if  SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-02-22 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 11:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 17:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 17:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-21 18:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 19:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 19:40 +0100
              Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-21 19:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-02-22 02:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-22 12:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-22 14:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-22 15:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-02-22 16:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-22 17:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-23 16:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-23 16:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-23 17:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts  power Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-02-23 17:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-02-22 14:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-02-22 15:40 +0100

csiph-web