Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1582645
| From | Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk |
| Date | 2017-02-16 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tbw0F-82M-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <taNPX-41e-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbcbD-3la-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbjd7-7Gj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tblyh-V3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tblRD-11D-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> [170215 20:26]: > On (02/15/17 20:03), Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> [170215 17:32]: > > > On (02/15/17 10:01), Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > [..] > > > > Below is another issue I noticed caused by commit f975237b7682 that > > > > I noticed during booting. > > > > > > do you mean that with f975237b7682 you _always_ see that illegal RCU > > > usage warning? > > > > Yeah on every boot on devices using cpuidle_coupled. > > does this mean that with the printk-safe patches reverted > (so, basically, the same conditions module 4 printk patches) > you don't see illegal RCU usage reports? at the moment I can't > see any connection between f975237b7682 and RCU usage from idle CPU. Yes reverting those four patches I listed earlier also makes it go away. Regards, Tony
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-02-13 20:10 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:10 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-14 17:20 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 18:00 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-02-14 18:10 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 05:50 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-02-14 19:40 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 05:50 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-02-14 18:00 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-02-15 19:10 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 02:40 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-02-16 05:10 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 05:30 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-02-16 16:20 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 17:40 +0100
Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-02-16 20:20 +0100
csiph-web