Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1582230
| From | Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able |
| Date | 2017-02-16 03:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tbjGa-85v-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tb9dM-1hF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbcll-3oS-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbeds-4zu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbeQa-4N5-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> > Just something to consider, provided the issues with multiboot get > > resolved: > > > > If you want to boot Xen you actually use the multiboot protocol, the > > last PVH > > boot patches had borrowed ideas from Multiboot to add an entry to > > Linux, only > > it was Xen'ified. What would be Multiboot 2 seemed flexible enough to > > allow all > > sorts of custom semantics and information stacked into a boot image. > > The last > > thought I had over this topic (before giving up) was-- if we're going > > to add > > yet-another-entry (TM) why not add extend Mulitiboot 2 protocol with > > the > > semantics we need to boot any virtual environment and then add > > Multiboot 2 > > support entry on Linux? We could redirect any custom boot mechanism > > then to > > just use that given its flexibility. > > > > Luis > > Multiboot has a fundamentally broken assumption, which is to do certain work for the kernel in the > bootloader. This is fundamentally a bad idea, because you always want to do things in the latest > step possible during the boot process, being the most upgradeable, and have the interface as > narrow as possible. > > Therefore, using Multiboot is actively a negative step. It is declared an "Open Standard" but > anything can be such declared; it really is a claim that "everything should work like Grub." Thanks Peter and Luis for comments. Chao
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-15 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-02-15 17:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-16 03:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able hpa@zytor.com - 2017-02-15 19:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-15 21:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able hpa@zytor.com - 2017-02-15 22:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-16 03:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able Daniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl> - 2017-02-17 00:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2017-02-17 06:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/boot: make ELF kernel multiboot-able Daniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl> - 2017-02-20 19:50 +0100
csiph-web