Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1579590
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() |
| Date | 2017-02-13 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tamd4-2uM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t9qC5-ha-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t9qC6-ha-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <takXD-1L4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <talgZ-1RY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <talAm-1ZB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> How often does it really make sense to keep such a product in this local variable? > > It depends. Lets take it the other way round. If I this in a review I'd > suggest the submitter to create a local variable for the multiplication > to get rid of the line break. It's avoidable. I imagine that there are further possibilities to improve the involved programming for various arrays. > And again, the compiler will optimize it away. > > Apart from the fact that you haven't tested your patch at all: This is true in principle as I could compile the source code adjustment at least. > jthumshirn@linux-x5ow:linux (test)$ git am ~/\[PATCH\ 3_5\]\ IB_hfi1\:\ > Adjust\ another\ size\ determination\ in\ > hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues\(\).eml > Applying: IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in > hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() > jthumshirn@linux-x5ow:linux (test)$ make > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_sdma.o CHK > include/config/kernel.release > CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h > CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h > CHK include/generated/bounds.h > CHK include/generated/timeconst.h > CHK include/generated/asm-offsets.h > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > CC drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_sdma.o > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_sdma.c: In function > ‘hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues’: > drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_sdma.c:402:2: error: ‘memsize’ > undeclared (first use in this function) > memsize = sizeof(*pq->reqs) * hfi1_sdma_comp_ring_size; > ^ How do you think about to apply also the previous update step like “[PATCH 2/5] IB/hfi1: Use kcalloc() in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues()”? > So to sum up: there is no evident improvement in the resulting binary There might not be a remarkable difference with the default software build parameters. > and you introduce a stylistic glitch (the new line break in a function call). There are different opinions about this implementation detail, aren't there? Regards, Markus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/5] IB/hfi1: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-10 22:10 +0100
[PATCH 1/5] IB/hfi1: Use kcalloc() in hfi1_user_exp_rcv_init() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-10 22:10 +0100
[PATCH 4/5] IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation in hfi1_user_sdma_process_request() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-10 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/5] IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation in hfi1_user_sdma_process_request() Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> - 2017-02-11 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 27/27] IB/hfi1: Code reuse with memdup_copy SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-13 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/5] IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation in hfi1_user_sdma_process_request() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-02-13 12:00 +0100
Re: IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation in hfi1_user_sdma_process_request() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-13 12:20 +0100
Re: IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation in hfi1_user_sdma_process_request() Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-02-13 15:10 +0100
[PATCH 5/5] IB/hfi1: Improve another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_process_request() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-10 22:10 +0100
[PATCH 3/5] IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-10 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/5] IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2017-02-13 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/5] IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-13 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/5] IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2017-02-13 11:00 +0100
Re: IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-13 11:40 +0100
Re: IB/hfi1: Adjust another size determination in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> - 2017-02-13 11:50 +0100
[PATCH 2/5] IB/hfi1: Use kcalloc() in hfi1_user_sdma_alloc_queues() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-02-10 22:10 +0100
csiph-web