Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1580334
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree |
| Date | 2017-02-14 07:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <taF61-6BY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tax8u-1hI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> failed like this:
>
> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
> bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union bpf_attr' has no member named 'attach_flags'; did you mean 'map_flags'?
> attr.attach_flags = flags;
> ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 7f677633379b ("bpf: introduce BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag")
>
> Unfortunately, the perf header files are kept separate from the kernel
> header files proper and are not automatically copied over :-(
No, that's wrong, the problem is not that headers were not shared, the problem is
that a tooling interdependency was not properly tested *and* that the dependency
was not properly implemented in the build system either.
Note that we had similar build breakages when include headers _were_ shared as
well, so sharing the headers would only have worked around this particular bug and
would have introduced fragility in other places...
The best, most robust solution in this particular case would be to fix the
(tooling) build system to express the dependency, that would have shown the build
failure right when the modification was done.
Thanks,
Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-13 23:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 07:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 07:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-02-14 10:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 14:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-02-14 14:30 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-14 15:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org> - 2017-02-14 09:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-16 04:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-02-16 04:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-16 04:50 +0100
csiph-web