Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1680822

Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting

Show all headers | View raw

On 4 July 2017 at 11:44, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:12:34AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 4 July 2017 at 10:34, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 09:27:07AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 07:06:13AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> >> > The running state is a subset of runnable state which means that running
>> >> > can't be set if runnable (weight) is cleared. There are corner cases
>> >> > where the current sched_entity has been already dequeued but cfs_rq->curr
>> >> > has not been updated yet and still points to the dequeued sched_entity.
>> >> > If ___update_load_avg is called at that time, weight will be 0 and running
>> >> > will be set which is not possible.
>> >> >
>> >> > This case happens during pick_next_task_fair() when a cfs_rq becomes idles.
>> >> > The current sched_entity has been dequeued so se->on_rq is cleared and
>> >> > cfs_rq->weight is null. But cfs_rq->curr still points to se (it will be
>> >> > cleared when picking the idle thread). Because the cfs_rq becomes idle,
>> >> > idle_balance() is called and ends up to call update_blocked_averages()
>> >> > with these wrong running and runnable states.
>> >> >
>> >> > Add a test in ___update_load_avg to correct the running state in this case.
>> >>
>> >> Cute, however did you find that ?
>> >
>> > Hmm,.. could you give a little more detail?
>> >
>> > Because if ->on_rq=0, we'll have done dequeue_task() which will have
>> > done update_curr() with ->on_rq, weight and ->running consistently.
>> >
>> > Then the above, inconsistent update should not happen, because delta=0.
>>
>> In fact, the delta between dequeue_entity_load_avg() and
>> update_blocked_averages() is not 0 on my platform (hikey) but can be
>> longer than 60us (at lowest frequency with only 1 task group level)
>
> But but but, how can that happen? Should it not all be under the same
> rq->lock and thus have only a single update_rq_clock() and thus be at
> the same 'instant' ?

idle_balance() unlock rq->lock before calling  update_blocked_averages
And update_blocked_averages() starts by calling update_rq_clock()

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 09:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-07-04 09:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 10:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-07-04 11:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 11:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> - 2017-07-04 12:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: fix false running accounting Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-04 13:10 +0200

csiph-web