Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1681500

Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] x86/mm: Try to preserve old TLB entries using PCID

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] x86/mm: Try to preserve old TLB entries using PCID
Date 2017-07-05 14:30 +0200
Message-ID <tZRBo-6aJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tXK1k-11t-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXK1l-11t-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:53:22AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> +static void choose_new_asid(struct mm_struct *next, u64 next_tlb_gen,
> +			    u16 *new_asid, bool *need_flush)
> +{
> +	u16 asid;
> +
> +	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PCID)) {
> +		*new_asid = 0;
> +		*need_flush = true;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (asid = 0; asid < TLB_NR_DYN_ASIDS; asid++) {
> +		if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[asid].ctx_id) !=
> +		    next->context.ctx_id)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		*new_asid = asid;
> +		*need_flush = (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[asid].tlb_gen) <
> +			       next_tlb_gen);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We don't currently own an ASID slot on this CPU.
> +	 * Allocate a slot.
> +	 */
> +	*new_asid = this_cpu_add_return(cpu_tlbstate.next_asid, 1) - 1;

So this basically RR the ASID slots. Have you tried slightly more
complex replacement policies like CLOCK ?

> +	if (*new_asid >= TLB_NR_DYN_ASIDS) {
> +		*new_asid = 0;
> +		this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.next_asid, 1);
> +	}
> +	*need_flush = true;
> +}

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] x86/mm: Try to preserve old TLB entries using  PCID Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-05 14:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] x86/mm: Try to preserve old TLB entries using PCID Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-07-05 18:20 +0200

csiph-web