Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1679548
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] x86/apic: Unify interrupt mode setup for SMP-capable system |
| Date | 2017-07-02 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tYRtL-5F7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tXVpM-np-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tXVpM-np-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
> -static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(void)
> +static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(int *upmode)
> {
> /* Check kernel option */
> if (disable_apic) {
> @@ -1206,12 +1208,30 @@ static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(void)
> if (!smp_found_config) {
> disable_ioapic_support();
>
> - if (!acpi_lapic)
> + if (!acpi_lapic) {
> pr_info("APIC: ACPI MADT or MP tables are not detected\n");
> + *upmode = true;
That store and extra argument is pointless.
> +
> + return APIC_VIRTUAL_WIRE_NO_CONFIG;
You added an extra return code, which you can use exactly for that purpose
at the callsite.
Aside of that, if you use int * then use numbers, if you use bool then use
true/false. But mixing that is horrible.
> + }
Thanks,
tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 05/12] x86/apic: Unify interrupt mode setup for SMP-capable system Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2017-06-30 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] x86/apic: Unify interrupt mode setup for SMP-capable system Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-07-02 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] x86/apic: Unify interrupt mode setup for SMP-capable system Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2017-07-03 04:40 +0200
csiph-web