Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1676734
| From | Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] slub: make sysfs file removal asynchronous |
| Date | 2017-06-28 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tXms1-81a-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tUyg2-4YJ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUzlM-5DB-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUzvt-5W2-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUzOO-62d-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUA89-69h-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Tejun Heo wrote: > And we have to weight that against the possibility of breakage from > the backport, however low it may be, right? I'm not strongly > convinced either way on this one and AFAICS the slub sysfs files there > are mostly for debugging, so we'd be risking breakage in a way more > common path (kmem_cache destruction) to avoid unlikely deadlock with a > debug facility. I think -stable backports should be conservative and > justified as breaking things through -stable undermines the whole > thing. The sysfs files are mainly used for reporting (the "slabinfo" tool accesses these files f.e.) But given the high rate of breakage of sysfs related patches: Lets just skip stable for now.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] slub: make sysfs file removal asynchronous Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-06-20 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] slub: make sysfs file removal asynchronous Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-21 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] slub: make sysfs file removal asynchronous Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] slub: make sysfs file removal asynchronous Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-06-21 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] slub: make sysfs file removal asynchronous Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-06-21 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] slub: make sysfs file removal asynchronous Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2017-06-28 16:50 +0200
csiph-web