Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1676032

Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf()

From Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf()
Date 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200
Message-ID <tX2D1-3Ko-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tVDnl-6P1-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWINY-6Zu-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tWSDE-5aT-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon 26 Jun 23:52 PDT 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:22:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
> > > flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
> > >
> > 
> > This API was implemented to reduce the memory pressure during firmware
> > load in the Qualcomm remoteprocs, but it wasn't available when I
> > upstreamed that code and I apparently forgot to send out the patch
> > moving us over to use this API...
> > 
> > Especially when loading the Qualcomm modem we have a couple of files
> > that we request_firmware() that are 10-15MB in size, so this
> > functionality is definitely wanted.
> > 
> > 
> > As we are calling release_firmware() immediately following the
> > request_firmware() I did attempt to just call
> > kernel_read_file_from_path() directly, but as I don't have access to
> > the fw_path[] this becomes inconsistent, so I would like to keep
> > request_firmware_into_buf().
> 
> Why would we keep it if there is no in-tree user for it?  If you want it
> sometime in the future, great, we can revert the deletion then, but
> keeping it around for nothing isn't ok, you know that :)
> 

Of course I know that :)

I did put a patch in the tubes for this yesterday [1], it's late for
v4.13, but I would be happy to see the API stay and we would have a user
in v4.14 (and tick this off Qualcomm's "required" list).

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/26/693

Regards,
Bjorn

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf() Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-23 22:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf() Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-26 22:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf() Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-06-27 09:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf() Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-06-27 19:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf() Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> - 2017-06-27 15:00 +0200

csiph-web