Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1672653

Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz_full CPUs

From Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz_full CPUs
Date 2017-06-22 16:00 +0200
Message-ID <tVaOm-5tA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tTUsh-4VS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tV8jv-3Vn-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Ingo,

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:11:53AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Commit-ID:  387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> Author:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:12:02 +0200
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:30:02 +0200
> 
> sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz_full CPUs

Thanks for applying the series! The two other patches are indeed good but
Rik and Mike have mitigated feelings about this very patch. I think we need to decouple
housekeeping from nohz_full before applying it. Is it possible to set it aside
for now?

Thanks!

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz_full  CPUs tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-06-22 13:20 +0200
  Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on  nohz_full CPUs Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:00 +0200
    Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on  nohz_full CPUs Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-06-22 21:50 +0200

csiph-web