Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1672332

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Nick,

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:20:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:49:52 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It could be this
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git/commit/?h=thin-ar&id=ec2c9c20f0efab37ae31de44fe0617aa61283905
> > 
> >     kbuild: handle libs-y archives separately from built-in.o archives
> > 
> > That touches the lib linking code regardless of CONFIG_THIN_ARCHIVE.
> > You should be able to revert it by itself (which will break a few
> > other archs, so you would also have to revert the default y patch
> > for thin archives to repair your tree if this is the cause).  
> 
> Yeah, reverting that commit fixes the sparc64 build. (i have not done
> that in today;s linux-next release, however).

But it broke the 32 bit sparc defconfig:

arch/sparc/lib/strlen.o: In function `strlen':
(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `strlen'
lib/string.o:string.c:(.text+0x4b4): first defined here

No unexpected, I expect :-)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-22 07:30 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 08:00 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-22 08:30 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-22 08:30 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 10:50 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-22 16:20 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-22 16:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 05:50 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:40 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-22 17:00 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 05:40 +0200
          RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-06-23 08:50 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-23 09:10 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-23 17:20 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-23 08:50 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:20 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:50 +0200

csiph-web