linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees

From	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees
Date	2017-06-22 07:30 +0200
Message-ID	<tV2QN-cZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Dave,

After merging almost all the trees, today's linux-next build (sparc64
defconfig) failed like this:

arch/sparc/lib/hweight.o: In function `__arch_hweight8':
(.text+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `__sw_hweight8' defined in .text section in lib/hweight.o
arch/sparc/lib/hweight.o: In function `__arch_hweight16':
(.text+0xc): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `__sw_hweight16' defined in .text section in lib/hweight.o
arch/sparc/lib/hweight.o: In function `__arch_hweight32':
(.text+0x18): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `__sw_hweight32' defined in .text section in lib/hweight.o
arch/sparc/lib/hweight.o: In function `__arch_hweight64':
(.text+0x24): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `__sw_hweight64' defined in .text section in lib/hweight.o

I though it may have been caused by the thin archive changes, but
disabling CONFIG_THIN_ARCHIVE did not fix it. I have cc'd Nick and
Masahiro just in case.

I am using powerpc-le hosted cross compilers:
	gcc 5.2.0
	binutsila 2.25.2

I have left it broken for now.

32 bit sparc is not affected.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-22 07:30 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 08:00 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-22 08:30 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-22 08:30 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 10:50 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-22 16:20 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-22 16:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 05:50 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:40 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-22 17:00 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 05:40 +0200
          RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-06-23 08:50 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-23 09:10 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-23 17:20 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-23 08:50 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:20 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most trees Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 16:50 +0200

csiph-web