Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1669908

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

From Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
Date 2017-06-19 22:30 +0200
Message-ID <tUbt8-7sP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <tSrVn-4m9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSseJ-4tL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSItb-6vK-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSMGu-Cd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tT34B-34P-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:46:33 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Morton
>> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:56:30 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> Caused by commit
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   088a5ecf7581 ("include/linux/string.h: add the option of fortified string.h functions")
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We really need to fix all the known problems it detects *before*
>> >> >> merging this commit ...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have reverted it for today.
>> >> >
>> >> > I am still needing to revert this every day ...
>> >>
>> >> I sent a series for -mm (or maintainers) to merge that should catch
>> >> everything. Do you want me to carry it in my kspp tree instead? (My
>> >> original intention was to carry all the fixes and the fortify patch in
>> >> kspp but akpm took it into -mm somewhat unexpectedly, not that I'm
>> >> complaining.)
>> >
>> > This is all getting a bit foggy in my mind.  Can we please have a full
>> > resend of everything?  Sufficient to hopefully produce a tree which has
>> > no build-time or run-time regressions?  Including the buildbot's
>> > recently-reported alpha and xtensa issues?
>>
>> It's been sent a few times (and a few fixes have been collected in
>> other trees already). What I've got in my for-next/kspp tree right now
>> is all the fixes that haven't already been picked up by other tree
>> maintainers, and I added the fortify patch itself to the end of the
>> tree too now since sfr asked for that a few hours ago.
>
> I think it's best to try to keep everything in a single tree, with
> maintainer acks where possible.
>
> I do this stuff all the time - please just send everything at me when
> we think we have all the fixes and I'll sort it out.

I'll send you the series now and remove it from my kspp tree.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-15 03:40 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-15 04:00 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 04:00 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-15 04:10 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 04:20 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-15 04:30 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 04:40 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-15 04:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-15 04:20 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 05:20 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-06-15 08:00 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-15 17:20 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-15 21:20 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-16 01:50 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 02:10 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-16 02:40 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-16 03:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-16 19:20 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-19 22:30 +0200

csiph-web