Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1671993
| From | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler |
| Date | 2017-06-21 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tUTXb-2iv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <tUgj8-20K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUuFs-2G9-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUONQ-7dN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUQPF-6J-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUTDQ-2a7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 06/21/2017 09:37 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Good news. Got the CALL to work. > > [ 145.670882] test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed] > > Awesome. Do you think with this implementation, the patch could get > accepted? If you think so, then I will send the patch in couple of > days after some refactoring, if not, then do let me know what more is > required? Nice, it's ultimately up to the arm folks to review the set in-depth, but feel free to send out the patch once you're done refactoring. With BPF_CALL support that looks quite good from pov of supported insns.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 03:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-06-20 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-06-21 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-06-21 22:00 +0200
csiph-web