Groups > linux.kernel > #1671984

Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

From	Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler
Date	2017-06-21 21:40 +0200
Message-ID	<tUTDQ-2a7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <tU9rk-6ah-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUgj8-20K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUuFs-2G9-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUONQ-7dN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUQPF-6J-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Daniel,

Good news. Got the CALL to work.

[  145.670882] test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed]

Awesome. Do you think with this implementation, the patch could get
accepted? If you think so, then I will send the patch in couple of
days after some refactoring, if not, then do let me know what more is
required?

Best,
Shubham Bansal

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 04:26 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> So ultimately, we call helper_function which takes u64 as arguments
>> only. I know its asking a lot, but can you please confirm this asap? I
>> would like to start implementing it.
>
>
> Yes, that is correct. I think it would be the better, more generic
> approach going forward to always assume that.

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 03:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-06-20 19:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 16:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-06-21 18:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 21:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-06-21 22:00 +0200

csiph-web