Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1671863

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper

From "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper
Date 2017-06-21 20:00 +0200
Message-ID <tUS54-VR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <tUKAz-4rR-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tULZD-5rk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tUQG0-8uH-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <tURsl-E0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tURC2-HR-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:20:47AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 10:16 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 08:49:03AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > On 06/21/2017 04:27 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:53:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:52:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > We need an atomic way to setup pmd page table entry, avoiding races with
> > > > > > > > > > > CPU setting dirty/accessed bits. This is required to implement
> > > > > > > > > > > pmdp_invalidate() that doesn't loose these bits.
> > > > [...]
> > > > > Any chance you could help me with arm too?
> > > > On arm (ARMv7 with LPAE) we don't have hardware updates of the
> > > > access/dirty bits, so a generic implementation would suffice. I didn't
> > > > find one in your patches, so here's an untested version:
> > > > 
> > > > static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> > > > 				   pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd)
> > > > {
> > > > 	pmd_t old_pmd = *pmdp;
> > > > 	set_pmd_at(mm, address, pmdp, pmd);
> > > > 	return old_pmd;
> > > > }
> > > So it seems the discussions have settled down and pmdp_establish() can be
> > > implemented in generic way as above and it will suffice if arch doesn't have
> > > a special need. It would be nice to add the comment above generic version
> > > that it only needs to be implemented if hardware sets the accessed/dirty
> > > bits !
> > > 
> > > Then nothing special is needed for ARC - right ?
> > I will define generic version as Catalin proposed with a comment, but
> > under the name generic_pmdp_establish. An arch can make use of it by
> > 
> > #define pmdp_establish generic_pmdp_establish
> 
> Can you do that for ARC in your next posting - or want me to once you have
> posted that ?

I'll do this.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-06-20 18:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-06-21 12:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-06-21 12:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-06-21 13:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-06-21 14:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2017-06-21 18:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-06-21 19:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2017-06-21 19:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-06-21 20:00 +0200

csiph-web