Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1667625
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] autofs: sanity check status reported with AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_FAIL |
| Date | 2017-06-16 12:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tSWPw-7fv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tPyA2-eM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSMwO-xz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSP1D-2jZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 15 2017, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:08:38 +1000 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> wrote: >>> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c >>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c >>> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_fail(struct file *fp, >>> int status; >>> >>> token = (autofs_wqt_t) param->fail.token; >>> - status = param->fail.status ? param->fail.status : -ENOENT; >>> + status = param->fail.status < 0 ? param->fail.status : -ENOENT; >>> return autofs4_wait_release(sbi, token, status); >>> } >> >> Sounds serious. Was the absence of a cc:stable deliberate? > > You need CAP_SYS_ADMIN to get the ioctl even looked at. Doesn't that > mean the bug can only be triggered by a process that could easily do > worse? > > Or do containers allow admins to give out CAP_SYS_ADMIN to untrusted > people?? I haven't been keeping up. Yep. They can be configured individually in fact, eg: $ docker run --cap-drop=ALL --cap-add=sys_admin -it debian:jessie /bin/bash root@aedebe8c46e0:/# capsh --print Current: = cap_sys_admin+eip Bounding set =cap_sys_admin Securebits: 00/0x0/1'b0 secure-noroot: no (unlocked) secure-no-suid-fixup: no (unlocked) secure-keep-caps: no (unlocked) uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups= cheers
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] autofs: sanity check status reported with AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_FAIL Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-06-16 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] autofs: sanity check status reported with AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_FAIL NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-06-16 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] autofs: sanity check status reported with AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_FAIL Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> - 2017-06-16 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] autofs: sanity check status reported with AUTOFS_DEV_IOCTL_FAIL Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-06-16 12:40 +0200
csiph-web