Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1667342
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit |
| Date | 2017-06-16 01:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tSMGu-Cd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tSGrn-5cj-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSI0a-63s-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSKY1-7Wn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tSMn7-tC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:26:19AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:57:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:48:18AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > While reviewing RCU's interruptible swaits I noticed signals were actually > > > not expected. Paul explained that the reason signals are not expected is > > > we use kthreads, which don't get signals, furthermore the code avoided the > > > uninterruptible swaits as otherwise it would contribute to the system load > > > average on idle, bumping it from 0 to 2 or 3 (depending on preemption). > > > > > > Since this can be confusing its best to be explicit about the requirements and > > > goals. This patch depends on the other killable swaits [0] recently proposed as > > > well interms of context. Thee patch can however be tested independently if > > > the hunk is addressed separately. > > > > > > [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170614222017.14653-3-mcgrof@kernel.org > > > > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > Are you looking to push these or were you wanting me to? > > I'd be happy for you to take them. OK, let's see if we can get some Acked-by's or Reviewed-by's from the relevant people. For but one example, Eric, does this look good to you or are adjustments needed? Thanx, Paul
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 01:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-15 01:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 18:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-15 18:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-06-15 19:10 +0200
[RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 20:50 +0200
[RFC v2 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 20:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 02:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-06-16 22:40 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-19 20:00 +0200
[RFC v2 2/2] rcu: use idle versions of swait to make idle-hack clear "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-15 20:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-16 00:00 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-06-16 01:30 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-16 01:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-06-16 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-19 20:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-06-15 19:40 +0200
csiph-web